Enterprise RTView® 
User Guide


Welcome - Enterprise RTView Deployment
One of the biggest challenges of providing data visualization to a variety of consumers is choosing the ideal deployment technology for your organization. There are many factors to consider, including optimizing the end user experience, hardware costs, maintenance costs, performance, scalability and security.

This section is designed to help you understand the various options, consider the pros and cons of each, and choose the optimal deployment.

Deployment Options
One major advantage of Enterprise RTView is that it is a portable delivery platform. This means that all displays, including graphical elements, data attachments, drill downs, functions, substitutions and security settings, are portable to any deployment option - without reengineering. This facilitates implementation and rollout since development, testing, and production systems can use different deployment technologies without significant porting costs. If situations change in your organization and you would like to choose a different deployment option, you can readily do so.

SL keeps current on the latest information delivery technologies, such as browser and portal options, scalable data distribution, application servers and security. This ensures that the most suitable option for your enterprise remains deployable with minimal costs. Currently there are five options for Enterprise RTView deployment.

If you have already chosen your deployment option, you can go directly to the deployment process from the following links.

Two Application Deployment Options

Four Browser Deployment Options Enterprise RTView is comprised of data sources, a client and possibly a server. Figure 1 is a high level illustration of the five deployment scenarios.
 
Figure 1: Deployment Overview

Application Deployment
In cases where the information delivered is of a critical, real-time, actionable nature, it may be desirable to deploy information via an application. For instance, infrastructure monitoring applications and critical operational dashboards can have a dedicated platform which only runs this application. End users can focus on monitoring and responding to the delivered information. In these cases it may not be desirable to deliver the information in a browser which might encourage an end user to browse away from critical information.

There are two application deployment options, Application with Served Data and Application with Direct Data Connection, as illustrated in Figure 2.
Figure 2: Application Deployment Overview

Browser Deployment
The most common deployment option chosen is a browser based deployment. Browsers are chosen for several reasons: they are a familiar tool for navigating to multiple sources of information, they are a standard application already resident on most enterprise platforms, and new information sources can be provided to end users without the additional IT expense of installing specialized software at each client.

There are three browser deployment options: Rich Client Browser with Served Data, Rich Client Browser with Direct Data Connection, and Thin Client Browser.

Rich Client Browser Deployment
The Rich Client Browser solution has become popular because it has faster processing abilities for interactions that are critical in some use cases. This is because more of the processing of interactive displays is done on the client machine via applet technology.

Most browsers only support minimal Java technology, making it necessary to install a Java plug-in on the client machines. In IT situations where the installation of a plug-in is not a problem, or it is already standard procedure, the Rich Client Browser deployment may be the best choice. However, in cases where installation of a Java plug-in is not desirable, the Thin Client Browser deployment would be the correct choice.

There are two Rich Client Browser deployment options, Rich Client Browser with Served Data and Rich Client Browser with Direct Data Connection, as illustrated in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Rich Client Browser Deployment Overview

Thin Client Browser Deployment
Thin Client Browser deployments are popular with IT departments that prefer the ease of deployment and maintenance achieved by this technology. With this option, the client need only have a standard browser installed to access the Enterprise RTView dashboards. This deployment requires the installation of the Display Server which uses AJAX technology to provide interactive dashboards to any standard browser. Recent advances in this technology have enabled the Display Server to perform comparably to Rich Client Browser deployments in most use cases.

As illustrated in Figure 4, there are two Thin Client Browser deployment options: Thin Client Browser with Served Data and Thin Client Browser with Direct Data Connection.
 
Figure 4: Thin Client Browser Deployment Overview

Choosing The Right Deployment
There are advantages and disadvantages to each type of Enterprise RTView deployment. Depending on your environment, there are at most three decisions to make. To make it easier, we provide a step-by-step guide to help you consider the pros and cons of each scenario, and readily determine which deployment is the right one for your organization.

Figure 5 illustrates your choices, starting with the first decision; whether to have an application or browser deployment.
 
Figure 5: Deployment Decision Process

Let's get started!


 
   


 
Enterprise RTView contains components licensed under the Apache License Version 2.0.

 

Treemap Algorithms v1.0  is used without modifications and licensed by MPL Version 1.1. Copyright © 2001 University of Maryland, College Park, MD

 

Datejs is licensed under MIT. Copyright © Coolite Inc.

 

JCalendar 1.3.2 is licensed under LGPL. Copyright © Kai Toedter.

 

jQuery is licensed under MIT. Copyright © John Resig,

 
JMS, JMX and Java are trademarks or registered trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the United States and other countries. They are mentioned in this document for identification purposes only. 

 
SL, SL-GMS, GMS, Enterprise RTView, SL Corporation, and the SL logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Sherrill-Lubinski Corporation in the United States and other countries. Copyright © 1998-2009 Sherrill-Lubinski Corporation. All Rights Reserved.